Understanding the Action Research cycle

As I venture into the realm of action research, Jean McNiff’s work, our first reading, has been a really practical guide through the misty complexities of educational inquiry. McNiff’s conception of action research as a deeply personal, reflective practice resonates with my quest to transform my teaching. This process isn’t a linear trajectory but a spiral, or a cycle, as presented in the workshop, of continuous growth, where each reflection and action leads to new insights and further questions, further research, further growth and development of my practice. So I’m writing this blog post after our first workshop to reflect, or maybe put in words, what I understand as Action research.

Following the chart shown in class, I try to recreate one, with my thoughts and questions I may have to answer in the coming weeks.

First, identifying the problem, where to start? Well, I think it could all begin with a simple yet profound realization: a need to enhance student experience and/or engagement in my classroom. Drawing on McNiff’s approach, I understood that action research is a strategy for improvement, starting not from a hypothesis but from a desire to make a difference in my practice. It is a form of living theory, where I am both the researcher and the subject, the practitioner seeking to understand and ameliorate my educational environment.

With the problem outlined, I should embark on a data collection phase. McNiff advocates for a variety of methods. This data may serve as a reflective mirror, revealing not just the students’ experiences but also my own pedagogical choices and their effects.

Informed by the data, I may plan and execute an intervention, a new strategy aimed at bolstering satisfaction or engagement. Here, McNiff’s iterative cycles of action and reflection became evident. Changes in my teaching approach were not just interventions but experiments in a living lab, where theory and practice intertwine. This phase can be dynamic, with each class offering a fresh opportunity to refine my methods. Here I can start to think about cycles. This also reminds me of sprints in agile working methodologies.

McNiff’s emphasis on self-evaluation has been particularly transformative. So monitoring the outcomes is not to validate a predetermined hypothesis but to critically assess the effectiveness of my actions. This will help ensure that the changes I made serve the intended purpose.

Perhaps the most impactful aspect of McNiff’s model is the review and reflection phase. It is here that I need to consider the broader implications of my actions. Was I fostering a deeper interest in learning the subject? Will or did my intervention align with my educational values? This reflective phase wasn’t just about assessing outcomes but about understanding my evolving identity as an educator.

Reflecting on the action research cycle, I believe I’ve gained a better perspective on my project’s potential directions. As my tutors often remind us in the first workshop, “keep it simple. Simplifying the approach allows the core issues to surface, unobscured by complexity.

Reference:

McNiff, J. (2002) Action research for professional development. Available at: https://www.jeanmcniff.com/userfiles/file/Publications/AR%20Booklet.doc (Accessed: 05 October 2023).

What’s the problem?

I started thinking a lot about my ARP project, the first task I put myself in was to come up with the research question. For that, I needed to reflect on any issues I have or had in my teaching context?

  • Now I have a bigger class, a lot of students, the same space, tech-based class.
  • Students not engaging in critical listening workshops.
  • Students not engaging with peer feedback.
  • Students not writing their blogs.
  • Need more diversity in the unit’s reading list.
  • More diversity in our music examples.

There are a few issues I could tackle with Action Research, but after our first workshop, I need to think of something small, a small intervention, small scale.

IP Blog post 3 – Race

Shades of noir

Shades of Noir offers a wealth of resources and inspiration for how I might apply its principles to my music production course. Firstly, curriculum design can greatly benefit from SoN by fostering inclusivity and cultural appreciation in course content. For instance, music production often focuses heavily on Western techniques and histories. I can aim to diversify this by including production styles, instruments, and histories from a variety of cultures. Not only will this expose students to a more comprehensive understanding of music production, but it will also validate and represent the experiences of students from diverse backgrounds.

Another key aspect of Shades of Noir is promoting social justice through representation. As an educator, I can incorporate the works of marginalised groups into my curriculum, showcasing their contributions to the music production industry. Consciously creating a platform for these voices in my classroom can help dismantle the systemic barriers they often face in the field.

Lastly, the idea of creating safe spaces aligns perfectly with fostering an open and supportive classroom environment. Open dialogue, respect for different perspectives, and active encouragement for students to articulate their views can be the cornerstone of this space. By implementing these, I hope to create a learning environment that facilitates self-determination and freedom from oppressive limitations.

Students research and work on this subject are invaluable sources of knowledge and can significantly impact my teaching practice. With a really diverse body of students, their work can reveal new artists, techniques, cultures, and perspectives that I may not have been aware of. As such, we are constantly promoting in-class discussions and showcases of their work within the classroom. These could also help when updating course content to reflect their diverse experiences and interests better.

Finally and in the future, I do want to try and guide third-year students to engage critically with the themes of social justice, representation, and inclusivity in their FMP.  In doing so, they research and learn about music production and become active participants in shaping a more equitable future for the industry.

‘A pedagogy of social justice education: social identity, theory and intersectionality’,

Social Identity Theory and Intergroup Encounters

Contact Hypothesis: This was a particularly enlightening concept. The Contact Hypothesis suggests that conflicts between different groups can potentially be resolved through positive interaction in a well-structured environment. This can lead to the deconstruction or even elimination of negative stereotypes, fostering a sense of cooperation or even reconciliation among conflicting groups, as seen in the Robbers Cave experiment.

Social Identity Theory (SIT): The text also provides a critical introduction to Social Identity Theory. It explores how individuals’ social identities can impact intergroup dynamics and can result in power imbalances. According to the critics of the Contact Hypothesis, the latter often overlooks the impact of social identities and power relations, thus leading to superficial or harmful intergroup encounters. Instead, these critics advocate for the use of Social Identity Theory, which considers these critical aspects in shaping intergroup relations.

An interesting question that arises from the text is about how we can completely remove the impact of society’s inequalities on interactions between groups during controlled experiments. Even when we take steps to promote equality within these controlled settings, can we really balance out or eliminate the deep-rooted societal inequalities that exist? It seems like these societal power imbalances are always present in real-world situations, and they undoubtedly affect the results of these group interactions. So, is there a way or method that can fully consider these outside influences and still allow for positive interactions between different groups?

Witness: unconscious bias

The video unveils some truly thought-provoking insights into the nature of unconscious bias within higher education, a phenomenon that tends to go unnoticed yet profoundly influences the experiences of many students and faculty. Featured speaker, Josephine Kwhali, expertly highlights the depth of these biases and the sometimes surprising unawareness of their existence, even among well-educated individuals.

In her engaging discourse, Kwhali questions whether the unconscious nature of these biases could serve as a reason, perhaps unintentionally, to mask or downplay the genuine issue of institutional racism. The question invites us to ponder the extent to which unconscious bias may become a scapegoat, detracting attention from the systematic prejudice that may be deeply embedded within educational institutions. It’s a critical consideration that compels us to evaluate how we address these complex social issues.

What strikes me as particularly fascinating in Kwhali’s argument is her commentary on the lecturers’ role in this dynamic. She brings into question how it is possible for these individuals, who are highly educated and create ground-breaking research, to not have a high degree of consciousness on these matters.  As educated adults tasked with shaping the minds of future generations, one would expect lecturers would have the ability to have a keen understanding of such issues.

Retention and attainment in the disciplines: Art and Design

I’ve learned two important aspects from the text. First, the report emphasizes the need for more in-depth examination and understanding of student experiences in Art and Design subjects, particularly those from ethnic minorities, there is still not much done about it. This insight underscores the critical necessity of diversity and inclusion within educational research. Second, the text discusses the importance of promoting a more inclusive approach to curriculum design, highlighting the need for diverse reading lists, visual references, and teaching methodologies, I think this could also be achieved by diversifying more the faculty and whoever is in charge of curriculum design.

One question that comes to mind from this text revolves around the potential impact of the interventions and research on these specific groups of students. Even though the research acknowledges the need for action, what concrete steps, and not only recommendations, are to be taken to ensure that the changes will tangibly improve retention and attainment for marginalized groups in Art and Design?

White Fragility by Robin Diangelo

The text explores the concept of “whiteness” as a structural advantage and a cultural standpoint in the context of the United States. The author identifies their perspective as a white person who has studied the nuanced implications of race, observing how prevailing social systems, including education and media, perpetuate racial illiteracy among white people. The text emphasizes that racism is a systemic issue embedded in institutions, beneficial to white people irrespective of individual prejudices. It addresses the concept of “white fragility,” which denotes white people’s low endurance for discomfort in conversations about race, and attributes this to an ingrained sense of superiority and entitlement. The author presents several factors that contribute to white fragility and racial illiteracy, such as racial segregation, individualism, entitlement to racial comfort, racial arrogance, racial belonging, psychic freedom, and constant messages of white superiority. The author concludes by proposing that the antidote to white fragility involves acknowledging racial privilege, actively understanding the racial realities of people of colour, and taking action against individual and systemic racism. The author shares their personal journey of understanding and challenging their own racism, urging other white individuals to undertake a similar journey toward racial humility.

As a music production teacher, I can integrate the resource about ‘Whiteness’ and its implications on racial dynamics in several ways. Understanding these dynamics could help to foster a more inclusive and empathetic learning environment. For instance, I can include discussions about how the music industry has historically privileged certain racial groups over others and how that affects the type of music that is valued and produced. I could incorporate lessons about influential musicians of colour and their contribution to the field despite systemic racism. This resource also reminds me to be aware of the diversity of my students and to ensure that I’m fostering an inclusive environment where all students feel heard and valued.

This summer, the BAMP team will be developing the Music Culture unit. We have been thinking that students could be assigned research projects or presentations that delve into the intersections of race and music. They could explore how certain genres have originated from specific racial and ethnic groups and how they have been co-opted or appropriated over time. This will be supported by seminars about the topic, plus some special lecturers that are experts on more specific issues.

IP blog 2 – Faith

‘Religion in Britain: Challenges for Higher Education.’

I have chosen two topics from the text, the ones that resonated with me the most: Multiculturalism from paper one and Religion and dissent in universities from paper two.

The text thoroughly discusses multiculturalism and its evolution. From initially being associated with the social movements and identity politics of gender, race, and sexuality in the 1960s, it has since expanded to include the accommodation of post-immigration ethno-religious minorities in the public space. This is characterised by an active support for cultural differences, discouragement of hostility, and the re-making of public spheres to include marginalised identities. Despite the term ‘multiculturalism’ being unpopular, especially in the context of international Islamist networks of terrorism, the multiculturalist sensibility—meaning the recognition of differences as worthy of equality and respect—remains intact, albeit extended to include religious groups.

The second text also delves into the complexity of religious diversity and the role of religion in public spaces, such as universities. It highlights that religion has often been both a source of dissent and a basis for pushing forward free speech doctrines. Furthermore, it explains how religious understanding informs views on topics like gender and sexuality, making them prominent areas of dissent within academic environments.

I can think of one question/provocation; the text suggests that religious identities like being a Muslim are “chosen beliefs”, and, therefore, might need or ought to have less legal protection than ascribed identities like gender and race. This perspective may provoke some questions or debate. For instance, how can multiculturalism evolve to accommodate religious differences further, especially considering that religion, like race or gender, is often not chosen but inherited at birth? This prompts a broader conversation about the intersectionality of identity and how multicultural policies can adapt to reflect this complexity.

Kwame Anthony Appiah Reith lecture on Creed.

The 2016 Wreath Lecture series on identity was indeed enlightening. Kwame Anthony Appiah’s lecture laid out the complexity and dynamic nature of identity, discussing its various influences – from national and cultural backgrounds to religious beliefs. Interestingly, he challenges the conventional notion of religious identity as solely belief-based, emphasising its communal and practice-oriented dimensions. The podcast critically examines our often-oversimplified interpretation of religious texts, highlighting how they require interpretation and reinterpretation over time, adapting to evolving social contexts. This narrative encourages a richer understanding of identity, recognising it as a multifaceted construct continually shaped by intersecting personal histories, societal contexts, and beliefs. Ultimately, it underscores the importance of questioning our preconceptions about identity, thus opening avenues for more inclusive and nuanced dialogues.

I was a Buddhist for 7 years

Holliday’s personal narrative depicts her experience within a Buddhist centre, emphasising a dissonance between spiritual ideals and actual practice. Initially enticed by meditation and community, her involvement deepened, but eventually, underlying issues became apparent. She confronted pervasive fundraising pressures, systemic sexism, and allegations of sexual misconduct. Disconcerting remarks reflecting casual racism further alienated her. The disparity between preached equality and observed hierarchy disillusioned her, leading to disenchantment with the organised religious structure. Holliday’s account elucidates the potential pitfalls of such spiritual institutions, including abuse of power and the exploitation of faith, fostering a newfound scepticism towards organised religions with colonial underpinnings.

Reflection about faith in the classroom:

To implement a more inclusive approach to different faiths in a music production course, it is essential to create an environment that fosters respect, understanding, and appreciation for religious diversity. One way to achieve this is by incorporating discussions and activities that encourage students to explore the intersection of faith, race, genre and music. This can involve inviting guest speakers from various backgrounds to share their perspectives on how music is intertwined with their beliefs and practices.

Additionally, it is crucial to provide students with resources and materials that highlight the rich musical traditions of different faiths. By exposing students to a wide range of musical expressions, they can gain a deeper understanding of the cultural significance and spiritual dimensions of music across different communities.

Furthermore, creating a safe space for open dialogue is vital. Facilitating discussions on the challenges and opportunities that arise when working with diverse faiths in music production processes can help students navigate potential sensitivities and address any misconceptions or biases. Encouraging students to share their own experiences, beliefs, and questions can foster a sense of empathy and promote mutual understanding among classmates.

Lastly, instructors should be mindful of any potential conflicts that may arise due to religious observances and provide flexible arrangements to accommodate students’ needs. This may involve scheduling studio sessions or rehearsals at times that consider religious holidays or providing alternatives for students who may have dietary restrictions due to their faith.

These could be some strategies we need to consider to implement in our classrooms. They can become a space where students can explore the diversity of faiths and their relationship with music and the production of records, fostering a more inclusive and culturally sensitive learning environment.

IP – Blog 1 – Disabilities

Disability service page

The commitment of UAL towards achieving inclusion and equality for disabled students is admirable. With over 3500 students in contact with the Disability Service, the university demonstrates its dedication to supporting students with various disabilities as defined by the Equality Act 2010. Whether it’s dyslexia, sensory impairments, physical impairments, long-term health or mental health conditions, autism, or other conditions impacting daily life, UAL offers pre-course advice and continuous support throughout the student journey. The Disability Advisers are there to explain available adjustments, support, and funding options. By embracing the social model of disability, UAL actively works to eliminate barriers and promote inclusive practices. This student-centred approach reflects the university’s respect, empowerment, and professional values.

As course leader and year group leader, I include information about the services provided by UAL. Furthermore, I work alongside the students with declared disabilities in their 1-on-1 tutorials to discuss accommodations for classes or assessments.

The ownership of sound – Thoughts on Christine Sun Kim video.
As a sound professional and lecturer, the phrase that struck me during the video was ‘The ownership of sound’ and how important the topic is for the deaf community.

Sound is often considered a universal experience, but it can exclude those who are deaf or hard of hearing. Society prioritises hearing perspectives and assumes sound as a default mode of communication. However, it is crucial to recognise that deaf people have their own rich culture and language, such as sign language. The reflection on ownership of sound calls for a broader understanding and acceptance of diverse communication methods. Embracing inclusivity means valuing and respecting all individuals’ unique experiences and contributions, ensuring their voices are heard and celebrated.

I will take a deeper look into this concept and use it for one of my Y1 lectures in the Introduction to Music Production unit; I think it would give the students a deeper understanding of the ownership of sound and its significance for the deaf community. It challenges the common assumption that sound is universally accessible and highlights the exclusionary nature of prioritizing hearing perspectives.

#DisabilityTooWhite

The interview with Vilissa Thompson highlights the lack of representation of disabled people of colour in the media. The #DisabilityTooWhite hashtag aims to address this disparity and spark discussions about the erasure of these voices. Thompson emphasizes the importance of accurate portrayals and the involvement of disabled actors of colour. Allies, especially white disabled or nondisabled individuals, play a role in amplifying these voices and acknowledging their privilege. The interview serves as a reminder of the ongoing work needed to promote inclusivity and understanding within the disability community.

Reflecting on the interview, I believe we should bring the issue to our classrooms and our artistic disciplines; we should emphasise the need for continued dialogue, reflection, and attention to the issues on this topic. By creating more diversity within the disability community and amplifying marginalised voices, we should work for a future where everyone feels included and represented. I asked myself how we could bring the conversation into our discipline. I try to think of significant music acts with disabilities, and only white artists come to mind.

Deaf Accessibility for Spoonies

The author shares the challenges they faced in accessing adequate pain management as a brown woman in Western and non-Western contexts. The text highlights the underestimation and undertreatment of pain experienced by women of colour, shedding light on healthcare disparities. The artist emphasizes the need for intersectionality in the arts, making productions accessible for disabled individuals and addressing chronic pain, fatigue, and mental health issues.

We must advocate for increased awareness and support for disabled artists, emphasizing self-care and seeking assistance when needed. It makes me think about touring musicians and crews. Is there any framework put in place for independent touring acts/bands? Are we thinking about it when planning tours? Or long recording sessions?

This is a reminder of the systemic barriers faced by disabled artists, urging for greater inclusivity and support within the arts sector. This topic and discussions could be added to our Audio Principals for Live Sound, where students are introduced to touring, and live sound practices.

Visual impairments in fashion = Hearing impairments in music

Reflection on Understanding Visual Impairment by Claudette Davis-Bonnick In Disabled People: The Voice of Many.

The text discusses the challenges individuals with visual impairments face in the fashion industry and education, highlighting the need for inclusivity and understanding of their experiences. Similarly, individuals with hearing impairments may encounter unique obstacles in studying Music Production due to the reliance on auditory cues, communication and what we assume as ‘the understanding of sound’. To create an inclusive learning environment, reasonable adjustments must be made to accommodate their specific needs. This could involve providing captioned videos, visual aids, or accessible communication methods like sign language interpretation. Additionally, the use of assistive technology systems can enhance their learning experience. Music Production courses can ensure equal access and promote inclusivity by recognizing the individual experiences of students with hearing impairments and implementing necessary accommodations. Like the text, I must remark that working with hearing impairment in music is entirely doable. It is crucial for the industry to prioritize awareness, education, and proactive measures to support and empower individuals with hearing impairments in pursuing their passion for music production.

The author remarks that, when talking about fashion education, “beauty is not only ocular”, referring to the use of other senses to understand the beauty in a piece of garment. However, can music and music creation be not only auditory?

Micro Teaching Session

I have always been fascinated by emerging technologies and how I could incorporate them into my teaching practice. I was excited to have the opportunity to deliver an object-based micro-teaching session; for this class, I chose a binaural microphone as the object, to teach about binaural recording. Binaural recording is a type of audio recording that captures sound in a way that mimics how it is perceived by human ears, creating a three-dimensional sound environment that can be reproduced using headphones.

Firstly, I found that preparing for the micro-teaching session was a valuable learning experience in itself. To effectively teach others about binaural recording, I needed to deepen my own understanding of the topic and develop a clear, concise and fast way to communicate it to others in the classroom. This required me to do extensive research on the technology and do some experiments with recording and mixing binaural audio.

One of the biggest challenges I faced in preparing for the micro-teaching session was finding the right balance between technical information and practical application; how deep I should go into the tech. While it was essential to convey the technical aspects of binaural recordings, such as microphone placement and techniques, I also wanted to make sure that the participants had a chance to experiment with recording and listening to binaural audio themselves. To achieve this balance, I decided to split the micro-teaching session into two parts: a presentation on the theory and technology of binaural recording, followed by a hands-on listening experiment with a binaural microphone active in the classroom.

During the micro-teaching session, I found that the participants were engaged and enthusiastic about experimenting with binaural recording themselves. I believed I provided the necessary technical information and creative uses of the technology for sound and music production, as well as some uses in sound archival and sound ecology practices.

The main feedback I received after the session was how I didn’t approach inclusivity in the micro-teaching session. The tech and the way that binaural reproduction is intended to listen is with two ears. Something I need to incorporate in my class is the acknowledgement that this method of recording and listening will be different to every single one of us, even more with individuals with any hearing impairment. This made me realise that a lot of what I do in my teaching practice has to do with listening, and I need to be more conscious about the acknowledgement and inclusivity of everyone.

Overall, I found delivering the micro-teaching session about binaural recording to be a rewarding and valuable experience. It allowed me to deepen my understanding of the topic while also reflecting on my practice. I was content with the feedback given by my peers and tutor. I will carry this lesson with me into future teaching and learning experiences.

UKPSF 2011 to PSF 2023

The UK Professional Standards Framework (UKPSF) 2011 and the new PSF 2023 are both frameworks designed to support the development of anyone working in higher education. While both frameworks share many similarities, several key differences set them apart; I will remark on the ones that stand out the most.

One of the significant changes between the UKPSF 2011 and the PSF 2023 is the increased emphasis on inclusivity and diversity. The PSF 2023 explicitly recognises the importance of creating inclusive learning environments and promoting diversity and equality. It also includes a new category of Core Knowledge and Skills for Inclusivity, highlighting the importance of understanding and addressing issues related to race, gender, sexuality, and other forms of identity.

Another important change in the PSF 2023 is the introduction of a new category of Recognising and Valuing Teaching. This category recognizes the importance of acknowledging and rewarding the contributions that teaching staff make to the wider academic community.

It is interesting, as it also encourages HE institutions to provide opportunities for staff to engage in scholarly teaching and to share their expertise with others.

The PSF 2023 also places a greater emphasis on the role of technology in teaching and learning; maybe after the experience of the pandemic, it just makes sense to have technology at the centre and driving force of education. It recognizes the increasing importance of digital skills and the need for teaching staff to use technology effectively in their teaching practice. As well as to embrace digital innovation and use technology to enhance the student learning experience.

The PSF 2023 represents a significant evolution of the UKPSF 2011. It reflects the changing nature of higher education and the increasing importance of inclusivity, diversity, recognition, and technology in teaching and learning. As such, I believe it will provide a valuable and updated framework for supporting the ongoing professional development of those working in the HE sector.

Professional Values in UKPSF 2011

As someone who has worked in higher education for a few years, I have seen first-hand the importance of the professional values outlined in the UKPSF 2011. I also believe that I have been practising those values in my past position in HE abroad and in my current teaching practice in the UK.

I consider these values crucial to ensuring that all staff involved in teaching and supporting learning can provide the best possible experience for students.

One of the key professional values emphasised in the UKPSF 2011 is a commitment to maintaining high standards of teaching and learning. This means taking a proactive approach to staying up-to-date with the latest developments in teaching and learning and seeking opportunities for professional development and growth. I believe this to be very important in a Music Production course, as the technology used in our practice evolves rapidly as the industry.

Also, to recognise the importance of creating a welcoming and inclusive learning environment for students from all backgrounds and taking steps to ensure that all learners can fully participate in the learning experience.

Finally, the UKPSF 2011 emphasises the importance of ethical and professional behaviour in the higher education setting. This means demonstrating honesty, integrity, and accountability in all aspects of teaching and supporting learning and always following a high standard of professional conduct.

Overall, the professional values outlined in the UKPSF 2011 are vital to ensuring that higher education institutions provide high-quality teaching, engagement and learning experiences for everyone. It would be interesting to compare it with the upcoming PSF.

Group making

In the last block, for one of my units, I had to divide the class into groups for their assignment. After a couple of weeks, once I got to know the students and their skills, I made the groups in a way I believed was balanced. For the most part, the groups worked, with some small issues in a few groups, but all of them delivered a well-produced piece of music.

For this new block, one of the units I’m leading also has a unit-long group project, so I wanted to approach the group-making process a little bit differently. First, I wanted to include the students in the process. Second, I wanted students to feel more comfortable in their groups in regard to the role they want to take part in and the style of music they will be producing.

I had some ideas on how to do this; I wanted to make this as fair as possible for everyone in the class. Obviously, some smaller social groups have already been formed by the students. So I wanted the groups to be formed not only with their closest classmates but with anyone with the same goals in mind regarding the project.

The first day of class came, and I opened the discussion on how should we make the groups. A few students responded that they would like to work with someone who would like to do the same style of music and with the same production style. A few of them already knew who they wanted to work with. They knew this was coming, so they had already formed some groups. Accepting those groups would have been a bit complicated as some students would have been left out.

So we came up with the idea of writing what they wanted to do in the project on a piece of paper. What Style/Genre do they want to produce if they want to go more into Acoustic or Electronic production, and if they know what role they want to take part in the group, as co-producer, engineer, composer, etc. And to write their names on the back. There was a problem; there were around 8 students that did not show up to class that day. So we would have to take them into consideration somehow.

Once we had the pieces of paper, I created the groups according to their affinity. Now, as you may see in the picture, it is evident that some students wrote exactly the same to be included in the same group, making the groups exactly as they wanted. But, in my favour, the students that did not have a group were included in teams where they would fit in just fine.

Afterwards, we included the absent students in some groups and formed new ones with the rest of them according to their interest in music and past projects. In the end, everyone present was happy and comfortable with their group, but I don’t know about the absent students; we might have to accommodate some groups next week.

Large group teaching

As a music production tutor, I have been accustomed to teaching small to medium size classes. From the beginning of my teaching career, I have had classes of 15 to 25 students. Even if the cohort size was larger, it has always been defined by the room size of the resources available for the lectures. As all my classes have been based in the recording studio or a computer lab, the room capacity has always been the limit.

During one of our PGCert sessions, we discussed different size teaching scenarios. I realised that I had never taught a large-size class. But I have given sporadic lectures to large audiences but never led a complete unit or module to a large class.

Large group teaching can present some unique challenges, but with the right approach, it can also be a rewarding experience for you and your students. This made me ask myself, in which scenarios could a large-size class (30+ students) could be beneficial or appropriate in a Music Production course?

I thought of two potential scenarios where a large-size class could be beneficial or appropriate, with some concerns/disadvantages, in a Music Production course:

100% theory-based units: units in music business, industry, and music distribution. Popular music studies, music culture and research skills. But if any of those classes want to introduce critical listening into the curriculum, we could run into the problem of not having adequate space for listening.

Guest Lectures and Workshops: Hosting guest lectures and workshops from industry experts can be an excellent way to expose students to different perspectives and new methodologies in Music Production. A large-size class could be appropriate in this scenario, as it would provide an opportunity to invite more prominent industry professionals and accommodate a larger audience. On the other side, this would limit the workshops and lectures to be more theory or discussion-driven and less hands-on.

Those would be the only scenarios I could think of. All the other lectures that have a technical component in the curriculum or the learning process would be really difficult to have them in large groups. First, as mentioned before, the resources and room capacity; it’s really difficult to lead a 30+ class in a computer lab, and it’s pedagogically impractical to have so many students in a recording studio; we would be throwing hands-on learning down the drain.

Where possible, a large-size class can present unique advantages and challenges in Music Production teaching. Still, it can also be an opportunity to engage with a diverse and larger group of students and explore new teaching approaches. It must be accompanied by designing a well-structured curriculum thought for larger groups. Engaging students through hands-on activities and fostering peer learning and collaboration. Could it work in some of our units? Maybe. Would I like to teach creative technical classes in a bigger group? Definitely not. Would I like to take a theory-based class in a large group? I really don’t know, my approach to teaching is based on creative technologies, but it would be a good experience.